Presentation
The Hi-BicLab has an interdisciplinary team, with previous and ongoing research on the history, the present of urban mobility in Lisbon and socio-territorial inequalities, and promotes cross-fertilization between academic disciplines, such as the history of technology and mobility, geography, transport economics, societal involvement, architecture and urban planning. In addition, it establishes partnerships with policy makers, activists and citizens. It has two renowned historians as consultants, with previous research on the subject and who called for further investigations into the mobilization of a "usable past" to foster future sustainable urban mobilities (Di10; Oz16), and with whom we have been working.
Portela Airport (1950s) (photo: António Passaporte), PT/AMLSB/PAS/002609, Lisbon Municipal Archive
Despite Portugal being the largest producer of bicycles in the European Union (Eurostat data for 2019), the modal distribution of cycling mobility in Lisbon is still quite low (below 1% in 2017) when compared to the European average (8%) (Faith20). By applying transitional measures to encourage cycling - such as the implementation of cycling infrastructure and bike sharing systems (Fé20) - the Lisbon City Council has committed to pro-cycling mobility agendas over the last decade. In fact, it hosted the European Cycling Federation Conference, Velo-City, in September 2021. Transport studies have shown that the city's orography does not explain its low modal distribution of bicycle use: 54% of the streets are almost flat, and 75% are "good enough for cycling" (below the 5% slope ) (Faith19; Faith20). In addition to Lisbon’s perception of the “seven hills”, other factors are beginning to be identified that are considered to be able to hinder the increase in cycling mobility, such as types of pavement, the feeling of insecurity when pedaling, and the behavior of car drivers ( Faith19). The identification of these barriers aims to support the design of policies to increase levels of cycle mobility in cities like Lisbon, with “low cycling maturity” (that is, with a low modal share in the use of bicycles and few infrastructures dedicated to cycling mobility) ( Faith19).
These cities with alleged “low maturity” are generally considered to have no historical experience in cycling mobility (Fé19). But is this really so? History shows that cycling mobilities were part of the past in cities like Lisbon. Furthermore, it also shows that the factors that limited its use are historically rooted processes.
[Paris Avenue] (c. 1952), PT/AMLSB/SPT/000048, Lisbon Municipal Archive
Hi-BicLab investigates both Lisbon's historical experience with cycling mobility and the factors that prevented or promoted its use, arguing that history is important in contributing to more sustainable and fair urban mobility (Ba07). Methodologically, Hi-BicLab: - makes existing historical knowledge accessible and readable for non-academic audiences; - identifies overarching issues through interdisciplinary work (linking history to relevant current issues in geography and transport economics); - identifies what partners know and want to know about the past; - create databases with historical sources, and choose key documents, visual and textual; - promotes the creation of a history laboratory, following previous experiences of history laboratories and societal engagement practices.